HomeEnforcement
All enforcement cases

National Westminster Bank Plc

FCA enforcement action, 2021

£265m
financial penalty
Money LaunderingAML
Where this fine sits
Rank (largest first)
#1 of 44
Top percentile
Top 5%
vs. median fine
72.8x
smallestlargest

What failed

Automated and manual red flags were not acted on as a commercial customer deposited around £365m, much of it in cash, far beyond its expected activity.

Read the final notice

The controls that would have caught it

These controls map directly to this failure. Open any one in the Control Builder to set your own thresholds, owners and systems, then export an implementation-ready spec.

In short, the firm needed

  • Cash-deposit anomaly rules tuned to expected turnover
  • Activity-versus-expected-profile monitoring with hard stops
  • EDD and re-rating triggers for cash-intensive businesses
  • Escalation when alerts repeat without resolution

Cash Deposit Anomaly Monitoring

Detective

Transaction Monitoring

Flags when a customer pays in cash that does not fit their declared business or income, so unexplained cash can be reviewed before it disappears into the system.

Starting threshold:
Cumulative cash deposits > 3x declared expected monthly cash turnover in a rolling 30 days, OR cash > 80% of total credits where the declared profile is not cash-intensive.
First-line owner:
Financial Crime Operations Analyst (transaction monitoring team)
Design this control

Structuring & Smurfing Detection

Detective

Transaction Monitoring

Catches people breaking one big payment into lots of smaller ones to stay under reporting or alerting limits, including when several accounts act together.

Starting threshold:
3 or more transactions each within 10% below a relevant threshold (e.g. the firm's cash reporting or alerting limit) by one customer in a rolling 7 days, OR 4+ sub-threshold credits from distinct linked parties funnelling to one beneficiary within a rolling 14 days.
First-line owner:
Financial Crime Operations Analyst (transaction monitoring team)
Design this control

Transaction-Monitoring Scenario Coverage Assurance

Detective

Transaction Monitoring

Checks that the firm's monitoring rules actually cover the risks the firm faces, so no major money-laundering pattern is left with no rule watching for it.

Starting threshold:
Zero unmapped assessed risks and zero in-scope product/channel populations missing from TM data feeds; any single coverage gap is an exception requiring a remediation plan with an owner and date.
First-line owner:
TM / Detection Engineering Lead (scenario estate owner)
Design this control

Typologies behind this case

Related enforcement cases

Enforcement data is sourced from the FCA fines dataset. The control mapping is an analyst view of what would have addressed the failings described in the public notice, not a statement of the regulator's findings.